John Paul II Did NOT Save Poland from Invasion. (According to former a US intelligence analyst and declassified info, Jimmy Carter's the one who did.)

                                                    Introduction

May 1st is a day of mourning.  It's the day when John Paul II, the altar boy molesta-
tion pope of unparalleled criminal negligence, was beatified.  Needless to say, it was
conjectured that the beatification was a diversionary tactic, intended to deflect atten-
tion away from the crimes of the present Vatican.  In fact, it was a suspicious thing,
because never in the church's 2,000 year history did a pope beatify his immediate
successor.  In this instance, Joseph Ratzinger beatified his former boss.  In this in-
stance, when Ratzinger beatified John Paul, Ratzinger molested each of the altar
boys anew.

On that day, people engaged in protests.  On that day, people were in grief.  When
John Paul was beatified people felt raped.  In order to understand this, you need to
know the experience of looking into the eyes of one, two, three, and even four vic-
tims of modern church corruption.  This includes the victims of retaliation and cover-
up as much as molestation.  Ironically, one year later, on the exact same date, hu-
manity is still protesting against all of the injustices that come to mind.  Concerning
this, don't leave John Paul's injustice out of your mind.  There are a lot of broken
lives still in need of repair.  So, cut it out with the Top 40 Teenie Bopper praise of
the Altar Boy Molestation Pope.  It's time for a reality check and a half.  Occupy
Wall Street has not faded away.

On that day on 2011, a mockery was made of the canonization process.  In fact, the
beatification of May 1, 2011 would constitute a conflict of interest, on behalf of the
Joseph Ratzinger who let the Marcial Maciel files be neglected by him for six consec-
utive years.

Concerning John Paul, he should have recused himself from the case and left the de-
cision about the grief-causing pope to a successor.   Before the beatification, the Vat-
ican should have interviewed at least two dozen sex abuse victims and three dozen
retaliation victims.  Even as recently as April 30, 2012, a witness to modern church
corruption feared coming forth, and this individual was a nun.

If the corrupt forces in the hijacked Catholic Church finally canonize John Paul, will
he be made the patron saint of altar boys or the priests who molested them?  While
he was making life on earth a living Hell for many, John Paul was the amicable patron
and protector of the molesting priests, especially the infernal Marcial Maciel.  See:

http://www.pagesofmary.com/2011/06/i-am-legion-we-are-money.html

The insult of the beatification would result in 20,000 pages of documentary evidence
and an official petition being filed at the Hague's international criminal court, during the
same year.  In fact, this filing occurred on April 11, weeks before the scheduled beati-
fication.  It meant nothing to the modern Vatican.  In fact, according to Ireland's Prime
Minister your pain means nothing to the narcissists who hijacked the Vatican.  More-
over, during the same year when John Paul was canonized, Ireland's prime minister
sent a mandate to the Vatican, on account of the crimes of clergy members in Ireland
which were repeatedly ignored by John Paul II.

Numerous Germans left the Catholic Church, on account of Ratzinger's ascension to
the Chair of Peter.  Now, throughout the history of the Catholic Church, the Chair of
Peter was occupied by saints and devils, depending the successor of the time of the
occupying.  You would think that the German prelate would have had the decency to
have resigned, and to have dismissed from office principle criminal prelates, including
the former secretary of state and present Dean of the College of Cardinals, Angelo
Sodano.  But noooooooooo.  Ratzinger had to drive even more multitudes from the
Catholic Church that used to give humanity people endowed with the gentleness of
a Francis of Assisi, a Clare of Assisi, a Catherine of Siena, and a Sir Thomas More.
To equate the altar boy molestation pope with a Francis of Assisi, a Francis of Sales,
or a Francis Xavier is a sick joke.

Those who were the principle accomplices of the crimes of the modern church are
still in power at the very Vatican where they engaged in the crimes.  None the less,
the praise of John Paul constituted teenie bopper idolatry.  He was credited with
having crushed Communism, despite the fact that Communist China now owns ov-
er $1.4 trillion worth of America's debt, and despite the fact that the same Maoist
dictatorship became an oppressive economic world power during John Paul's reign.
The present regimes of China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, and Laos show that
over a billion people are still locked in Communist tyranny.

Add to this all of the other sweatshop nations which equally constitute dictatorships
which rob people of their civil rights.  Don't forget the military junta nations, such as
Burma (Myanmar), and nations in chaos.  Plus, keep in mind that many dictatorships
falsely title themselves the people's republic of this, that, and the other thing.  In ad-
dition, the Russian election of 2011 resulted in the Communist Party possessing 92
seats in the Duma (Russian Parliament.)

John Paul did little more than make vain stage appearances and curtain calls.  He suc-
ceeded in crushing the spirits of devout Catholics more effectively than Soviet tanks
crushed the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the Czech Revolution of 1968.

Concerning John Paul II, the bottom line is that he did not make his world a better
place as did Saint Patrick in Ireland and St. Francis in Assisi Italy.  Yet, in the pre-
dictable Orwellian con game, we were being told for years that the world was now
a better place.  It was a far worse place.  The economic crisis of 2008 and all that
was uncovered during it proved otherwise.  The wave of terrorism since 2001 also
prove otherwise, and economic conditions which resulted in the worldwide OWS
Movement proved the same.  Yet, John Paul was praised as a one-man liberator,
even of Poland.  In as much, the truth concerning Poland needs to be made known,
simply to take people out of their hypnotic trance, concerning the media marketing
campaign of John Paul II:

Jimmy Carter is the one who Saved Poland from Invasion

It was Jimmy Carter who ordered the tactic that prevented Poland from being invaded
by Russian armored units, and it was the citizens of Moscow, along with Russian mili-
tary personnel, in their refusal to fire on their own Russian people, who brought Soviet
satellite statesmanship to an end.  Proof of this exists in what happened the very year
Carter left office.

For those unfamiliar, Russia almost rolled into Poland in 1979 and 1980, but were
deterred by one simple Jimmy Carter tactic.  Carter then left office in 1981.

Reagan's first year in office: 

Jaruzelski suddenly declared martial law, in December of 1981.  This shows that he
saw Reagan as enough of a bumbler and a paper tiger that he would test Reagan.
Therefore, it was former military officer James Earl Carter who was the one hold-
ing the Communists at bay. 

The Source for the Following:

The confirmation source of the following information is a former Washington D.C.
intelligence analyst.  For the record, nothing below is classified.

Background

In 1968, the Soviets were already halfway into Czechoslovakia before anyone knew
they invaded.   Therefore, the Soviet crackdown on Czechoslovakia was guaranteed.
However, during the John Paul years, American technology kept the West current on
Soviet troop movement.   This included the movement of Soviet armored and infantry
divisions during the near-invasion of Poland.

The Polish Crisis During the Carter Years

Being that American technology had Russia's number, President James Earl Carter
kept declassifying intelligence on current Russia troop movements and released it to
the public.  Jimmy was telling the Russians that NATO knew where they were in re-
lation to Poland's topography.  The Russians, in turn, knew that they didn't have the
benefit of stealth, as they were forced to entertain the possibility that NATO would
be their welcoming party, if they decided to roll into Poland.  It's that simple.

There is another logical reason for Russia to have declined to invade Poland.  Russia
was already in Afghanistan, as of Christmas season 1979.  It had enough on its plate.
In as much, there was no type of religious conversion going on with the Soviets in the
Year 1980.  Their consciences weren't being enlightened and their hearts weren't be-
ing moved.  They would have invaded Poland if they knew they could get away with
doing so.  Jimmy Carter made sure that they wouldn't risk invading Poland.  Thus, no
speech of John Paul had any effect on the Russians. 

The Following is Standard History:

The Iran hostage crisis was in progress, and Russia was waiting to see if it would have
an excuse to roll into Iran.  If America rolled in, Russia would have followed.  So, do
not be deceived into thinking that the Russians would have cowered so close to their
own terrain.

For those not taught well in school, know this:  Russia's greatest quest was long since
understood by Western analysts to be the acquisition of a warm weather port.  Invad-
ing Iran would have given the Russians the opportunity to achieve that goal.  Invading
Poland wouldn't have given them any warm water port.  Therefore, the Russians elect-
ed to forgo Poland out of logistics ... not by moral conversion.  Oil-producing Iran was
more valuable than non-petroleum Poland.  After all, Russia still had a hold on White
Russia, aka Belarus.  Therefore, Poland was expendable.

                                The Way Jimmy Carter Really Was

The following anecdote about Carter came via the Pentagon:  Shortly before Jimmy
was to be sworn-in, he was being given a detailed tour of the Department of Defense.
There came the point when he was being told that a helicopter would always be on a
pad, ready to take him to command headquarters within 15 minutes, in the event of a
military emergency.  Jimmy asked, "Is this true?"  His tour guide: "Yes sir.  Within 
15 minutes."  Jimmy then looked at his wrist watch and said, "Okay.  Go!"  "Sir?"
While looking at his wrist watch Jimmy once again said, "Go!"  He wanted to test the
procedure on the spot.  Such was former navy officer Jimmy Carter.

Incidentally, Jimmy Carter was the first military officer in history to head the clean-
up of a nuclear power plant leak.  Chernobyl wasn't the first one in history and Three
Mile Island wasn't the first nuclear crisis in the Western Hemisphere  The Chalk River
Plant in Canada was.  It occurred on December 12, 1952.  Twenty-seven years later,
Jimmy saved Poland from its pending crisis.  Who gives him the credit for having done
so?  This is ingratitude for you.
________________________________________________________________

Official Inflation Stats

Apparently, Republican operatives gamble on you not checking facts.   This was evi-
denced in the presidential debates of 2011.  Republican candidates were caught not
stating facts.  In as much ...

If you have heard someone on the radio, the web, or TV mention that Obama and
the democrats are printing money to the point of toxic inflation, know this:  The facts
prove the assertion to be a scare tactic.  The statistics prove it to be a lie.  Republican
operatives are once again crying wolf.  Of course, they accuse Obama of "monetizing
the debt;" the act of printing money, in order to pay the debt and thereby lowering the
value of the dollar.  However, there is no evidence of alarming inflation.  Needless to
say, the game has been to claim that the runaway inflation is around the corner and
coming soon.  Scare tactics get annoying very quickly. 

   Outline of Recent Inflation Rates, One Year of which Yielded Deflation

Inflation for the Year 2011 was merely 3.16%.  In fact, the highest rate of inflation dur-
ing Obama's tenure was a mild 3.87% for the month of September 2011.  The lowest
was -2.1%, in July of 2009.  During the Barrack Obama years, inflation was -.34%
for 2009 ... 1.64% for 2010 ... and the previously mentioned 3.16%  for 2011.  As
you can see, the Republicans were caught lying once again.

In United States history, inflation was:  17.26% in the Year 1918 ... 15.9% in the
Year 1920 ... 10.97% in the Year 1942 ... 14.65% in the Year 1947 ... 11.3% in
the Year 1974 ... 11.22% in 1979 ... 13.58% in 1980 ... and 10.35% in the Year
1981.  In addition, it was 7.74% in 1948 ... 7.88% in 1951 ... 6.16% in 1982 ...
and 7.39% in the Year 1990.  Now, compare those figures to the Obama years.

The Republican tactic is to scare you into voting for the Republican candidate.  This
is entirely sophomoric and immature.  A Republican should weigh his candidacy on
the good that he can accomplish for the vast majority of humanity, as opposed to tell-
ing you how evil the opposing candidate is.

The Republicans continue to cry wolf, telling you that you have to vote Republican or
else the world will come to an end.  No.  If you vote Republican, then the world really
will come to an end.  Look at what happened to Ampad Inc, after Romney's firm took
charge of it.  If went into Chapter 7 Bankruptcy after Romney's firm and Romney him-
self made windfall income from the mismanagement of Ampad.  It was a systematic
dismantling of a corporation.

hhttp://massresistance.org/romney/ampad_062607/index.html

http://www.boston.com/news/daily/26/ampad.pdf

Of course, the democrats have congressional members who are self-seeking mani-
pulators, too.  It's just that the Republicans are not limited to the quantity of "some."
With them, it's total ruthlessness.

Do not be deceived.  If the Republicans had there way, there would be a slave class,
comprising 66% to 80% of the human population.  If not a slave class, it would be a
class of unpaid volunteers, mingled with people who work full time yet can not pay
their bills.  The Republican truly are a plague of devouring locusts who always make
everyone else look like the plague.  Or else they make you like anti-American when
you object to people amassing money unjustly.

Inflation for the past several has not been a problem in the least.  So, why did the Re-
publicans bring that subject to the fore, as if we were in an inflation crisis?

ANS:  To give an excuse for the unjustified price rises in diesel fuel and gasoline.
            It was an unconscionable diversionary tactic.  Look at the inflation facts
            yourself, so that you can be assured that, once again, Republicans cried
            wolf.

             http://inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx

               In order to understand the recent and drastic fuel price hikes, see:

                    http://www.midnightdestiny.com/2012/02/petroleum.html

               http://www.midnightdestiny.com/2011/10/investment-lesson.html
 _______________________________________________________________

Link to the April 11th Radio Talk Show Interview

In re: 

The interview of Patrick Pontillo by the Forward Blitz Network, in which Reaganom-
ics was the designated topic.  The interview eventually branched out into other topics.
I must admit that I was having a bit of trouble with asthma that evening, but went to
lengths to conceal it as much as possible.  I have yet to be interviewed in an asthma-
free zone.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/forwardblitz/2012/04/12/revolution-now-2012--a-look-at-what-trickles-down
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In Response to Rick Santorum's Comments about Church, State, and the United States Bill of Rights

      If there were absolute separation of Church and State in America, 
      there would have never been chapels on United States military bases.
      In light of this, consider the following commonly encountered scenarios.

1]  The police officer hired by the State directs traffic solely for the benefit of parish-
      ioners leaving a Sunday church service.  If there were the absolute separation of
      Church and State, there would be no police officers directing church traffic any-
      where in America, and there would be chaos on State roads on Sundays.

2]  The detective hired by the state investigates the allegations of clergy abuse com-
      mitted upon parishioners.  If there were absolute separation of Church and State
      in America, the molestation of altar boys would have gone unchecked and have
      become a pandemic.


3]  In 1844, Philadelphia-area Protestants, in their paranoiac hatred of a pope they
     never met, torched a Catholic Church.  In fact, they literally fired a canon at it. 
     In response, soldiers employed by State rallied to the protection the Catholics
     who, at the time, were hated with seething ferocity by certain Protestant sects. 
     If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, there would have
     been either a massacre in Philadelphia or the start of a literal civil war there.

     The Conclusion is that the First Amendment Establishment Clause requires the
     State to make sure that its citizens are able to freely practice religion. 

     In the alternate:

1] Catholic, Quaker, and Episcopalian schools fulfilled the job of the State in edu- 
     cating students in non-religion subjects such as mathematics, science, history, art,
     and literature.  This means that there are religious institutions that functioned as the
     State five days a week.  After all, the State enacted mandatory school laws and reli-
     gious institutions fulfilled said laws by educating many youth above and beyond the
     topic of religion.
                                                      Added note:

               When a private entity acts as the government, in being the surrogate
               of said government, it's known as "acting under the color of law."
               You can sue the federal government for a civil rights violations com-
               mitted by a private institution acting under the color of law.

2] Catholic and Protestant charities of varying sort fulfill the job of the State in going
     to the aid of hurricane victims, even to the point of receiving federal dollars in the
     process.  In fact, the Catholic Church, for years, received taxpayer dollars through
     social service government contracts.  In this capacity, churches have acted under
     the color of law.  Churches have become the surrogate of the government.

3] Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant medical facilities act under the color of law each
     time their facilities treat a patient sponsored by the medicaid program.

4] Catholic, Jewish, Moslem, Protestant, Hindu, etc, chaplains are hired by the U.S.
     government, to care for the spiritual well-being of U.S. military personnel.  They
     are not hired to establish any one religion.  Rather, they are paid to secure the re-
     ligious rights of the military personnel who need chaplains, in order for the religious
     rights to be something real.  During WWII, there were priests at the war fronts giv-
     ing last rites to mortally wounded American soldiers and to anyone else caught in
     the line fire.  The United State government funded the priests, the chaplains behind
     the front line, and the military chaplain in the States.
 
    Other observations involving the relationship between Church and State:

1] The television broadcast of Midnight Mass somewhere on Earth is governed by
     the FFC in America.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State,
     the church would have to intrude on frequencies designated by the government,
     in order to broadcast to humanity.

2] The private jet which flew John Paul II and Benedict XVI throughout portions of
    America flew solely under the law of the FAA.  If there were the absolute separa-
    tion of Church and State, the jet carrying a pope would have crashed into another
    jet liner eventually, or else such a jet would have created aerial havoc.

3] The priests and nuns made homeless by a hurricane have the right to seek help
     from FEMA.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, then
     priests and nuns would freeze to death during blizzards, drown during floods,
     and remain without shelter after tornadoes. 

In addition:

It is a well known practice to begin a congressional session with a chaplain praying be-
fore the session.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, then no
prayer of any kind would be heard in a congressional chamber.  It's simply that the re-
ligions take turns in delivering the opening prayer in American congressional chambers,
because there is no established religion in America.

The Federal Judiciary Conclusion:  The phrase "Separation of Church and State"
is a misnomer.  Mention of it does NOT appear in the United States Constitution.  Rath-
er, the United States Bill of Rights has the Establishment Clause which forbids the fed-
eral government or any individual State to establish an official state religion.  The same
clause protects a citizen from having his religion outlawed, unless the religion involves
criminal activity.

The First Amendment Establishment Clause guarantees that NO person will have to
support or adhere to a religion to which he does NOT want to belong.  It also guar-
antees that a person willing to adhere to a specific religion will not be required by the
government to violate his conscience in matters of faith and morals, provided that the
matter of conscience is written into the religion's official doctrine. 

One more thing:

If the practice/activity of a religion involves the doing of something illegal, then the re-
ligion is not permitted to practice it.  The example classically used was bigamy.  If a
religion allows bigamy, members of that religion are not permitted to practice bigamy
in the United States.

In the inverse, if an activity mandated by the State is NOT permitted by a person's re-
ligion, then the individual has the right to not be a part of the activity declared sinful in
his religion.  The most obvious example is war and the Quakers. 

In conclusion:

The much controverted United States First Amendment clause is NOT referred to as
the Separation of Church and State Clause, being that there is no absolute separation
of Church and State.  The operative phrase is the Establishment Clause.  This means
that you do not have to join a religion that you don't want to join.  This also means that
you can't force someone to stop practicing his/hers.
________________________________________________________________

Protest Sign Suggestions

If you're planning to attend an upcoming demonstration in the U.S. any time this year
and are having trouble thinking of a message to put on your protest sign or lengthy
banner, then take a peek at the following.  You might come up with a better idea.
But, at least you will have had the jump-start needed to get the better idea.  Then
again, you just might find what you're looking for here.

By the way  ...  No Violence  ...  Got it?

United, We Stand.
Divided, We Fall ...
for con artist politicians.

Big Oil, Small Minds. 

American CEO's suck the blood
of foreign sweatshop workers. 

We want to make a living.
Corporations want to make a killing.

Profit margins marginalize humanity. 

Big Brother is watching his bottom line.  $$$

Uninsured people dying of cancer all
happen to be socialists, according to
the Republican Party.

A Republican is a leech who 
doesn't want to pay his workers.

States' Rights are asinine in an era when
you can fly to three states in one day. 

The Protestant Work Ethic is when indentured
servants, chattel slaves, or sweatshop workers 
do the Protestants' work for them.

Republicans think that the Bill of Rights has
a 9% surcharge and is payable in thirty days.

Consumer demand creates jobs; not Wall Street's rich.

Buying foreign is fine, if foreign buys American in return.

Dear 99% of China, the $1.4 trillion owed to you by the U.S.
is in overseas corporate tax havens.  Feel free to help your-
selves.   We'll never see it.   Sincerely, 99% of America.

A well-paid foreign worker is also an American consumer.
One being paid 75 CENTS an hour can't even afford a
razor blade to slit his wrists.

America hangs from a cross of depleted uranium.

Henri Houdini's face should be on the dollar bill,
and the caption under it should read, "Now you
see it.  Now you don't."

Texas isn't fireproof and Rick Perry isn't God.

How many more Chinese aircraft carriers does
the American consumer have to finance?

More congressional funding is needed, so that the
TSA can find out the color of your underwear.

Hire consumer service reps who have accents
Americans can understand, or else teach 
Americans Hindi, Bengali, and Punjabi.

You need money to create consumer demand.
Ours is gone.

Yes Virginia, there is a Monsanto Clause.
It's used to sue American farmers.

Buy American, instead of sell out America.

My Job is now in a foreign sweatshop.
So too is America's conscience.

Iron workers built America. 
Corporations let it fall apart.

Next stop, debtor's prison.
After that, Nuremberg. 
=================

Sincerely, 
Patrick Pontillo
_____________________________________________