Introduction
May 1st is a day of mourning. It's the day when John Paul II, the altar boy molesta-
tion pope of unparalleled criminal negligence, was beatified. Needless to say, it was
conjectured that the beatification was a diversionary tactic, intended to deflect atten-
tion away from the crimes of the present Vatican. In fact, it was a suspicious thing,
because never in the church's 2,000 year history did a pope beatify his immediate
successor. In this instance, Joseph Ratzinger beatified his former boss. In this in-
stance, when Ratzinger beatified John Paul, Ratzinger molested each of the altar
boys anew.
On that day, people engaged in protests. On that day, people were in grief. When
John Paul was beatified people felt raped. In order to understand this, you need to
know the experience of looking into the eyes of one, two, three, and even four vic-
tims of modern church corruption. This includes the victims of retaliation and cover-
up as much as molestation. Ironically, one year later, on the exact same date, hu-
manity is still protesting against all of the injustices that come to mind. Concerning
this, don't leave John Paul's injustice out of your mind. There are a lot of broken
lives still in need of repair. So, cut it out with the Top 40 Teenie Bopper praise of
the Altar Boy Molestation Pope. It's time for a reality check and a half. Occupy
Wall Street has not faded away.
On that day on 2011, a mockery was made of the canonization process. In fact, the
beatification of May 1, 2011 would constitute a conflict of interest, on behalf of the
Joseph Ratzinger who let the Marcial Maciel files be neglected by him for six consec-
utive years.
Concerning John Paul, he should have recused himself from the case and left the de-
cision about the grief-causing pope to a successor. Before the beatification, the Vat-
ican should have interviewed at least two dozen sex abuse victims and three dozen
retaliation victims. Even as recently as April 30, 2012, a witness to modern church
corruption feared coming forth, and this individual was a nun.
If the corrupt forces in the hijacked Catholic Church finally canonize John Paul, will
he be made the patron saint of altar boys or the priests who molested them? While
he was making life on earth a living Hell for many, John Paul was the amicable patron
and protector of the molesting priests, especially the infernal Marcial Maciel. See:
http://www.pagesofmary.com/2011/06/i-am-legion-we-are-money.html
The insult of the beatification would result in 20,000 pages of documentary evidence
and an official petition being filed at the Hague's international criminal court, during the
same year. In fact, this filing occurred on April 11, weeks before the scheduled beati-
fication. It meant nothing to the modern Vatican. In fact, according to Ireland's Prime
Minister your pain means nothing to the narcissists who hijacked the Vatican. More-
over, during the same year when John Paul was canonized, Ireland's prime minister
sent a mandate to the Vatican, on account of the crimes of clergy members in Ireland
which were repeatedly ignored by John Paul II.
Numerous Germans left the Catholic Church, on account of Ratzinger's ascension to
the Chair of Peter. Now, throughout the history of the Catholic Church, the Chair of
Peter was occupied by saints and devils, depending the successor of the time of the
occupying. You would think that the German prelate would have had the decency to
have resigned, and to have dismissed from office principle criminal prelates, including
the former secretary of state and present Dean of the College of Cardinals, Angelo
Sodano. But noooooooooo. Ratzinger had to drive even more multitudes from the
Catholic Church that used to give humanity people endowed with the gentleness of
a Francis of Assisi, a Clare of Assisi, a Catherine of Siena, and a Sir Thomas More.
To equate the altar boy molestation pope with a Francis of Assisi, a Francis of Sales,
or a Francis Xavier is a sick joke.
Those who were the principle accomplices of the crimes of the modern church are
still in power at the very Vatican where they engaged in the crimes. None the less,
the praise of John Paul constituted teenie bopper idolatry. He was credited with
having crushed Communism, despite the fact that Communist China now owns ov-
er $1.4 trillion worth of America's debt, and despite the fact that the same Maoist
dictatorship became an oppressive economic world power during John Paul's reign.
The present regimes of China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, and Laos show that
over a billion people are still locked in Communist tyranny.
Add to this all of the other sweatshop nations which equally constitute dictatorships
which rob people of their civil rights. Don't forget the military junta nations, such as
Burma (Myanmar), and nations in chaos. Plus, keep in mind that many dictatorships
falsely title themselves the people's republic of this, that, and the other thing. In ad-
dition, the Russian election of 2011 resulted in the Communist Party possessing 92
seats in the Duma (Russian Parliament.)
John Paul did little more than make vain stage appearances and curtain calls. He suc-
ceeded in crushing the spirits of devout Catholics more effectively than Soviet tanks
crushed the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the Czech Revolution of 1968.
Concerning John Paul II, the bottom line is that he did not make his world a better
place as did Saint Patrick in Ireland and St. Francis in Assisi Italy. Yet, in the pre-
dictable Orwellian con game, we were being told for years that the world was now
a better place. It was a far worse place. The economic crisis of 2008 and all that
was uncovered during it proved otherwise. The wave of terrorism since 2001 also
prove otherwise, and economic conditions which resulted in the worldwide OWS
Movement proved the same. Yet, John Paul was praised as a one-man liberator,
even of Poland. In as much, the truth concerning Poland needs to be made known,
simply to take people out of their hypnotic trance, concerning the media marketing
campaign of John Paul II:
Jimmy Carter is the one who Saved Poland from Invasion
It was Jimmy Carter who ordered the tactic that prevented Poland from being invaded
by Russian armored units, and it was the citizens of Moscow, along with Russian mili-
tary personnel, in their refusal to fire on their own Russian people, who brought Soviet
satellite statesmanship to an end. Proof of this exists in what happened the very year
Carter left office.
For those unfamiliar, Russia almost rolled into Poland in 1979 and 1980, but were
deterred by one simple Jimmy Carter tactic. Carter then left office in 1981.
Reagan's first year in office:
Jaruzelski suddenly declared martial law, in December of 1981. This shows that he
saw Reagan as enough of a bumbler and a paper tiger that he would test Reagan.
Therefore, it was former military officer James Earl Carter who was the one hold-
ing the Communists at bay.
The Source for the Following:
The confirmation source of the following information is a former Washington D.C.
intelligence analyst. For the record, nothing below is classified.
Background
In 1968, the Soviets were already halfway into Czechoslovakia before anyone knew
they invaded. Therefore, the Soviet crackdown on Czechoslovakia was guaranteed.
However, during the John Paul years, American technology kept the West current on
Soviet troop movement. This included the movement of Soviet armored and infantry
divisions during the near-invasion of Poland.
The Polish Crisis During the Carter Years
Being that American technology had Russia's number, President James Earl Carter
kept declassifying intelligence on current Russia troop movements and released it to
the public. Jimmy was telling the Russians that NATO knew where they were in re-
lation to Poland's topography. The Russians, in turn, knew that they didn't have the
benefit of stealth, as they were forced to entertain the possibility that NATO would
be their welcoming party, if they decided to roll into Poland. It's that simple.
There is another logical reason for Russia to have declined to invade Poland. Russia
was already in Afghanistan, as of Christmas season 1979. It had enough on its plate.
In as much, there was no type of religious conversion going on with the Soviets in the
Year 1980. Their consciences weren't being enlightened and their hearts weren't be-
ing moved. They would have invaded Poland if they knew they could get away with
doing so. Jimmy Carter made sure that they wouldn't risk invading Poland. Thus, no
speech of John Paul had any effect on the Russians.
The Following is Standard History:
The Iran hostage crisis was in progress, and Russia was waiting to see if it would have
an excuse to roll into Iran. If America rolled in, Russia would have followed. So, do
not be deceived into thinking that the Russians would have cowered so close to their
own terrain.
For those not taught well in school, know this: Russia's greatest quest was long since
understood by Western analysts to be the acquisition of a warm weather port. Invad-
ing Iran would have given the Russians the opportunity to achieve that goal. Invading
Poland wouldn't have given them any warm water port. Therefore, the Russians elect-
ed to forgo Poland out of logistics ... not by moral conversion. Oil-producing Iran was
more valuable than non-petroleum Poland. After all, Russia still had a hold on White
Russia, aka Belarus. Therefore, Poland was expendable.
The Way Jimmy Carter Really Was
The following anecdote about Carter came via the Pentagon: Shortly before Jimmy
was to be sworn-in, he was being given a detailed tour of the Department of Defense.
There came the point when he was being told that a helicopter would always be on a
pad, ready to take him to command headquarters within 15 minutes, in the event of a
military emergency. Jimmy asked, "Is this true?" His tour guide: "Yes sir. Within
15 minutes." Jimmy then looked at his wrist watch and said, "Okay. Go!" "Sir?"
While looking at his wrist watch Jimmy once again said, "Go!" He wanted to test the
procedure on the spot. Such was former navy officer Jimmy Carter.
Incidentally, Jimmy Carter was the first military officer in history to head the clean-
up of a nuclear power plant leak. Chernobyl wasn't the first one in history and Three
Mile Island wasn't the first nuclear crisis in the Western Hemisphere The Chalk River
Plant in Canada was. It occurred on December 12, 1952. Twenty-seven years later,
Jimmy saved Poland from its pending crisis. Who gives him the credit for having done
so? This is ingratitude for you.
________________________________________________________________
