One must give credit where credit is due, even as it applies to Newt Gingrich, and
even though there might possibly be a disingenuous motive involved. Newt has re-
cently spoken out against the paranoiac, ethnic-prejudiced policy of shipping unregi-
stered immigrants back from where they came. Deportation isn't presently part of his
vocabulary. Observe:
"I don't see how the -- the party that says it's the party of the family is going
to adopt an immigration policy which destroys families that have been here
a quarter century, and I'm prepared to take the heat for saying, let's be hu-
mane, in enforcing the law without giving them citizenship but by finding
a way to create legality so that they are not separated from their families."
Newt Gingrich apparently has engaged in more than enough hypocrisy in his lifetime
and has no more room to harbor any further doses of it. Or else he is appealing to
the Catholic and Hispanic votes. The alternative would be that he is trying to re-
deem himself, politically speaking, concerning what he stated about child labor laws
being "truly stupid." The only other conclusion is that he is trying to welcome into
this nation a slave class of adolescent janitors, in following-up on his claim that the
child labor laws are truly stupid. Is he trying to construct a spider's web for Latin
American youth in need?
There is an element of humanity in everyone. After all, Attila the Hun was notably
affectionate toward his children and Adolph Hitler was kind to dogs. Newt is pre-
senting himself as humane, as well as the heroic black swan who will not cow-tow
to every issue in the Republican Party platform. Due to his past, his motivation is
unclear. Whether it's a disingenuous game that he is playing or not, he is correct in
that you don't break apart families and/or married couples if they are not engaged
in criminal conduct, even if they are unregistered foreign nationals, as it relates to
those economically disadvantaged and those fleeing violent lands. Very simply,
what if you were the homeless and hungry immigrant who felt abandoned in your
own land?
The Contradiction of the Self-proclaimed "Moral Majority"
Calling yourself the "Moral Majority" is self-righteous arrogance. As it applies to the
immigration issue, it's outright hypocrisy. Anti-immigrant Moral Majority Republicans
have a major contradiction which goes as follows: In the Bible which most of them
worship as the answer to everything everywhere, it expressly states that Jews were
commanded to NOT harass, molest, encumber, or treat with disdain the foreign im-
migrants in their land, because the Jews were once strangers in Egypt. Caucasian
America, by its nature, is 100% immigrant. This means that the passengers of the
Mayflower were all illegal immigrants who were never deported. Thus, the anti-
immigrant stance of the white Republican world is intolerable hypocrisy. Accord-
ing to the hypocrisy, it's okay for whites bearing slaves to come into America, but
not for Latins to enter, despite the fact that it was Latins who re-discovered Amer-
ica, in the first place. After all, neither Cristoforo Colombo nor Queen Isabella nor
a single crew member of the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria were from Scotland.
Incidentally, the Bible expressly states that not everything is in the Bible. A case in
point goes as follows: Nowhere is it mentioned that Sunday is the Christian Sabbath.
Stating that everything is in the Bible was the white racist isolationist way of claiming
that Christian doctrine was not dependent upon the ratification of Saint Peter and his
successors. The Successor of Saint Peter denotes Italy. Italy denotes the Mediter-
ranean. Thus, it denotes foreigner. Thus, it denotes evil to anyone alienated from
God and locked in racism and/or ethnocentrism.
For centuries, Christianity recognized, as a matter of course, that Peter was the rock
upon which the only Christ built his only church ... building said church upon Jews,
Roman martyrs, and a couple of saints from Alexandria Egypt and Antioch Lebanon,
and not upon Anglo Saxons. Of course, the Roman-based papacy is in a Latin na-
tion and not in white Anglo America. Thus, it is viewed as evil by those who view
the immigration of Latin Americans as sheer evil.
Latin Americans come from a long Catholic tradition where they believe that the suc-
cessor of Peter holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus, they are perceived
as double evil. You need to realize the nexus between anti-Catholicism and the anti-
immigrant stance of Bible toters. If Anglo Canadians were coming across the north-
ern border, how upset would American whites be? Such whites would have found
an economic means to adapt. They would probably have proposed new business
ventures.
Latin Americans come from a long Catholic tradition where they believe that the suc-
cessor of Peter holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus, they are perceived
as double evil. You need to realize the nexus between anti-Catholicism and the anti-
immigrant stance of Bible toters. If Anglo Canadians were coming across the north-
ern border, how upset would American whites be? Such whites would have found
an economic means to adapt. They would probably have proposed new business
ventures.
In response to the claim that anti-immigrant stances are patriotic stances against the
criminal infiltration from Mexico: 1} George Bush had eight years and massive fire
power to clean up Mexico. He showed zero hesitation in invading nations. Howev-
er, he elected to waste billions of dollars and thousands of lives in an Iraq which had
zero WMDs. Incidentally, Weapons of Mass Destruction wasn't the original phrase.
The original phrase was Weapons of Indiscriminate Destruction (WID's). The Bush
administration didn't even get that part right. None the less, did it ever occur to you
that a number of immigrants came to America to avoid the evils in Mexico that Amer-
ica had a complete right and civic duty to clean-up? When your border nation has
13,000 drug related killings per year, you have a moral obligation to intervene. All
that invading Iraq did was get Christians there persecuted.
The anti-papacy of white closet racists and their anti-immigrant stance is one and the
same. It's nothing deep nor ideological. It's sheer hatred, as well as being the indica-
tion that said anti-immigrant people are alienated from the God who created the souls
of Latin American immigrants. These people fail to see the brotherhood of man and
all that involves said brotherhood. Yet, they will dress in hoods, expressing a white
only brotherhood, as if God only created whites and Satan created all else of human-
ity. The thinking is that twisted.
The same anti-immigrant mindset of today is what caused Catholic churches in Phila-
delphia to burn at the hands of prejudiced Protestants in 1844. It's a very dangerous
mindset. It is an eye-opening experience to see a Southern native woman start to go
into convulsions merely at the sound of the word, Pope. It's reminiscent of exorcism
accounts where the exorcist brings out the holy water or the relic of a saint, to the
shock of the possessing demon. Zero composure. Zero ideological debate. Zero
diplomacy. Practically a convulsion.
The South's demons haven't left for Hell, yet. They are still in the South. The same
demonic forces that hung African men from trees without due process of the law, and
which rendered Michigan freedom riders murdered are still here. The anti-immigrant
stance belongs to those people alienated from God, as they fear that said immigrants
will steal their jobs. Ironically, if you would end the foreign sweatshop importation
economy, and turn the Southern border into an Ellis Island scenario, you WILL be-
gin an American Renaissance, provided that Mexico be cleansed of its criminal ele-
ment and provided that manufacturing returns to America in ample quantities. This
includes super green technology. It's ironic that Texan George Bush obsessed him-
self with a contained and inspected Iraq, while doing nothing about the true danger
to human life, namely Drug Lord Mexico and Oppressive Industrialist Mexico.
I've seen the typical crew of Latin Americans work, and they were impressive, to say
the least. They were athletic about the trade I saw them perform, and were as talent-
ed in that craft as many Latin Americans were talented in baseball. Could the talent
of the Latin American tradesmen be what intimidates the person seeking said trades-
man to be ousted from this nation?
Concerning the obsession with the Bible possessed by the Southern Baptist mindset,
the New Testament was presented to the world by the Catholic Church. It is literally
Catholic Church property stolen by the protestant world who then took the interpre-
tation of it entirely out of context. That is to say, the Bible was not the creation of
Protestants. Bishops of the Catholic Church once assembled and approved the list
of texts which comprises the New Testament that sits on the desk of even the most
racist Southern Baptist. Yet, the typical racist Bible toter will not give credit to the
ancient Catholic bishops for the Bible he totes.
The traditionally prejudiced Southern Baptist world displays defamatory hypocrisy
in stating the the Catholic Church is a heathen anti-Christ religion that discourages the
reading of the Bible. At every Catholic Mass, the Bible is read. It's simply not inter-
preted according to the Southern Baptist mindset, especially when it comes to this
thing called the Rapture. The Catholic Church, the compiler of the Bible, states that
there will never be such a thing. The Catholic Church was here first. It should know,
no matter how corrupted pockets of it become, from time to time.
Behind the beach house I've inhabited for the past several years (whenever I wasn't
staying in the North) is a married couple who were both intelligence officers, station-
ed in Washington DC. Now, if you think that you are going to have an former agent
tell you top secret info, think again. They're practically paranoid about letting any-
thing slip, being an occasional intelligence officer has been prosecuted for releasing
classified info. However, a lot of information was never top secret, and a bit of info
is now declassified. One thing confided to me was the allegation that education in
this Johnny Reb sector of America is purposely dumbed-down, because, if the na-
tives here were to ever learn the true score of things, they will no longer tolerate the
tyranny of the Good Ole Boy Caste System. The Republican party now carries
guilt by association with said caste system.
The last thing my dad made sure that I understood, shortly before pancreatic cancer
entered his life, was to not be deceived into thinking that the Republican Party was
anything more than a cabal of money grabbers who would put the world into slavery
if tey could get away with doing so. Now, He was an accomplished engineer, mean-
ing that he had the agile use of reason. He was also part of the Battle between Heav-
en and Hell that was fought in Nazi Airspace, meaning that he had insights about life
and death that few people develop. To him, the Republican Party was a heartless
and predatory clan. I must concur, pursuant to my personal experiences. In fact, the
volume of slave labor merchandise importation is proof positive.
Now, Newt could possibly be trying to get a slave class to come to America, or else
something known as a conscience is settling into his mind. The third option is that he
is trying to secure the Catholic vote. No matter what, the OWS Movement, in its
clash with the Republican mindset, is a repeat performance of the clash between the
19th Century abolitionists and the chattel slave economy of the Confederate South.
An Exposé in Bible Belt Hypocrisy
Here is one of the many passages that the Bible Belt has traditionally ignored:
Then the king will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my
Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you ever since the foundation of
the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you
gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me,
ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.’ Then the righteous
will answer him and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you,
or thirsty and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger and wel-
come you, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you ill or in prison,
and visit you?’ And the king will say to them in reply, ‘Amen, I say to you,
whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.’
Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you accursed, into the
eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you
gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, a stranger and you
gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison,
and you did not care for me.’ Then they will respond, ‘Lord, when did we see
you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not min-
ister to your needs?’ He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did
not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’ And these will go
off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”
The souls of Bible toters are filled with the cancer of hypocrisy. The Bible is nothing
more than their camouflage, designed to trick you into thinking that they have God's
permission in what they do. What they have been doing has absolutely nothing to do
with Christianity. You might think that you hate Christianity. You are only hating re-
ligious hypocrisy. A tree is know by its fruits. Their fruits fall from a tree entirely dif-
ferent than the tree of Christianity. Whatever be the motivation of a Newt Gingrich
who still has to prove he's humane, he was right in what he said about immigration.
_______________________________________________________________
